5-1 Disscussion To begin, review the provided case note Word Document and identify inaccuracies in interpretation. Then, in your initial post, address the
To begin, review the provided case note Word Document and identify inaccuracies in interpretation. Then, in your initial post, address the following:
- Describe the inaccuracies you found in the note, and explain why these are inaccuracies.
- Explain how the identified inaccuracies should be corrected.
- Explain the importance of accurately interpreting medical terminology. Consider the impact on both patient care and health documentation.
Respond to at least two of your peers by pointing out any inaccuracies they did not see or providing suggestions on how to interpret the inaccuracies. In addition, discuss commonalities or differences in the ways your peers explained the importance of accurately interpreting medical terminology. What insight can you provide your peers? Did your peers identify reasons that you found particularly insightful?
Note: You must submit your initial post before you can see your peers’ posts.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric PDF document.
HCM 205 Discussion Rubric
The discussions in this course might be new and very different from discussions you have had in other courses. This discussion offers you the opportunity to
express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. This discussion format
should not be viewed as a short paper with citations. APA formatting, including the use of citations, is not required.
Imagine yourself sitting around a conference table with your instructor and classmates. This discussion board will be similar. It is a place to have lively
conversations on the course content with your instructor and peers. These discussions will help you internalize the course content and become more
comfortable with it. You should provide thoughtful responses using the course content to support your statements. Although these discussions are informal, be
aware of how you are presenting yourself professionally. Do not use slang and be aware of your spelling.
You are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment. You will need to submit your
initial post before you can see your peers’ posts.
For your initial post (1), you must do the following:
· In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m.
· In Modules Two through Eight, complete the initial post by Thursday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
· Take into consideration material such as course content and other
discussion forums from the current module and previous modules,
For your response posts (2), you must do the following:
· Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial
· In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
· In Modules Two through Eight, complete the response posts by Sunday
at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
· Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating “I agree” or
“You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt.
Note: To receive credit for this assignment, you must score “Evident” in two of the three critical elements listed below. Your instructor will encourage you to
repost or clarify as needed to ensure you receive credit.
Critical Elements Evident (100%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Clarity of Communication Initial post clearly communicates key ideas and thoughts
related to the prompt
Does not clearly communicate key ideas and thoughts in an
initial posting related to the prompt
Timeliness Submits initial post on time Initial post is not submitted or is submitted late 25
Response Engagement Posts responses that build off the initial post and
incorporate course concepts
Response posts are missing or do not build from initial posts
and incorporate course concepts