BUS3059 Week 2 Discussion Discussion The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competenci

BUS3059 Week 2 Discussion Discussion
The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competenci

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

BUS3059 Week 2 Discussion Discussion
The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered.
For this assignment, choose one of the following questions and post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned.
To support your work, use your course and text readings and also use outside sources. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week.
Question One: Measuring Responses
In the present business environment, the best decisions are the ones that are informed decisions. Such decisions are based on collecting and analyzing good data.
In order to properly measure, for example, the customers’ preferences regarding a product, it is important for a survey to ask the correct questions and in the correct manner.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of conducting a face-to-face interview compared with a less personal approach such as having someone fill out a questionnaire online?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having structured questions compared with unstructured questions?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of asking open-ended responses compared with structured responses?
What are some alternative response strategies?

Question Two: Obtaining Results from a Survey
Surveys are a good tool for collecting valuable information, if designed and implemented properly.
It is important that a survey provide valuable results.

What can be done to assist in obtaining relevant results from a survey?
How can a researcher build rapport with a participant?
Would confidentiality likely lead to better results for a survey? Why or why not?
What is pretesting? Is it useful in obtaining relevant results from a survey?

Justify your answers using examples and reasoning. Comment on the postings of at least two peers and state whether you agree or disagree with their views. SUO Discussion Rubric (40 Points) – Version 1.2
Course: BUS3059-Quantitative Business Analysis SU01

Response
No Submission
0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14-
16)
16 points

Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points

Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points

Criterion Score

Quality of Initial

Posting

/ 20
No initial posting

exists to evaluate.

The information

provided is inaccurate,

not focused on the

assignment’s topic,

and/or does not

answer the question(s)

fully. Response

demonstrates

incomplete

understanding of the

topic and/or

inadequate

preparation.

The information

provided is accurate,

giving a basic

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A

basic understanding is

when you are able to

describe the terms and

concepts covered.

Despite this basic

understanding, initial

posting may not

include complete

development of all

aspects of the

assignment.

The information

provided is accurate,

displaying a good

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. A

good understanding is

when you are able to

explain the terms and

topics covered. Initial

posting demonstrates

sincere reflection and

addresses most

aspects of the

assignment, although

all concepts may not

be fully developed.

The information

provided is accurate,

providing an in-depth,

well thought-out

understanding of the

topic(s) covered. An in-

depth understanding

provides an analysis of

the information,

synthesizing what is

learned from the

course/assigned

readings.

Participation
No Submission
0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-6)
6 points

Satisfactory (C: 7-8)
8 points

Proficient (B: 9)
9 points

Exemplary (A: 10)
10 points

Criterion Score

Participation
No Submission
0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-6)
6 points

Satisfactory (C: 7-8)
8 points

Proficient (B: 9)
9 points

Exemplary (A: 10)
10 points

Criterion Score

Participation in

Discussion

/ 10
No responses to other

classmates were

posted in this

discussion forum.

May include one or

more of the following:

*Comments to only

one other student’s

post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as

just one line or saying,

“Good job” or “I agree.

*Comments are off

topic.

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts but only on one

day of the week.

Comments are

substantive, meaning

they reflect and

expand on what the

other student wrote.

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts on more than

one day. Comments

are substantive,

meaning they reflect

and expand on what

the other student

wrote.

Comments to two or

more classmates’ initial

posts and to the

instructor’s comment

(if applicable) on two

or more days.

Responses

demonstrate an

analysis of peers’

comments, building on

previous posts.

Comments extend and

deepen meaningful

conversation and may

include a follow-up

question.

Writing
No Submission
0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-6)
6 points

Satisfaction (C: 7-8)
8 points

Proficient (B: 9)
9 points

Exemplary (A: 10)
10 points

Criterion Score

Total / 40

Writing
No Submission
0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1-6)
6 points

Satisfaction (C: 7-8)
8 points

Proficient (B: 9)
9 points

Exemplary (A: 10)
10 points

Criterion Score

Writing Mechanics

(Spelling,

Grammar, Citation

Style) and

Information

Literacy

/ 10
No postings for which

to evaluate language

and grammar exist.

Numerous issues in

any of the following:

grammar, mechanics,

spelling, use of slang,

and incomplete or

missing citations and

references. If required

for the assignment, did

not use course, text,

and/or outside

readings (where

relevant) to support

work.

Some spelling,

grammatical, and/or

structural errors are

present. Some errors

in formatting citations

and references are

present. If required for

the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for initial

post but not

comments to other

students. Sources

include course/text

readings but outside

sources (when

relevant) include non-

academic/authoritativ

e, such as Wikis and

.com resources.

Minor errors in

grammar, mechanics,

or spelling in the initial

posting are present.

Minor errors in

formatting citations

and references may

exist. If required for

the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for both

the initial post and

some of the comments

to other students.

Sources include course

and text readings as

well as outside sources

(when relevant) that

are academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles, other

text books, .gov Web

sites, professional

organization Web

sites, cases, statutes,

or administrative

rules).

Minor to no errors

exist in grammar,

mechanics, or spelling

in both the initial post

and comments to

others. Formatting of

citations and

references is correct. If

required for the

assignment, utilizes

sources to support

work for both the

initial post and the

comments to other

students. Sources

include course and

text readings as well as

outside sources (when

relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles, other

text books, .gov Web

sites, professional

organization Web

sites, cases, statutes,

or administrative

rules).

Overall Score

No Submission
0 points minimum

There was no

submission for this

assignment.

Emerging (F to D Range)
1 point minimum

Satisfactory progress has not been

met on the competencies for this

assignment.

Satisfactory (C Range)
28 points minimum

Satisfactory progress has been

achieved on the competencies for

this assignment.

Proficient (B Range)
32 points minimum

Proficiency has been achieved

on the competencies for this

assignment.

Exemplary (A Range)
36 points minimum

The competencies for this

assignment have been

mastered.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality