Can You Help Me With Homework? Needed By Tuesday 2/01/2022 All information attached RUBRIC Ethics and Compliance Programs

Determine the fundamental ways

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

All information attached 

RUBRIC Ethics and Compliance Programs 

Determine the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Alaska. Support your response with one example from each of these schools’ scandals.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 21.6 (13.50%) points

Competent 24.48 (15.30%) points

Exemplary 28.8 (18.00%) points

Examine the principal ways in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Alaska. Support your response with one example from each of these schools’ scandals.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 21.6 (13.50%) points

Competent 24.48 (15.30%) points

Exemplary 28.8 (18.00%) points

Predict the key differences in the scenarios that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Alaska if an effective ethics program was in place. Provide a rationale for your response.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 21.6 (13.50%) points

Competent 24.48 (15.30%) points

Exemplary 28.8 (18.00%) points

Postulate on two actions that the NCAA leadership should take to regain the trust and confidence of students and stakeholders.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 21.6 (13.50%) points

Competent 24.48 (15.30%) points

Exemplary 28.8 (18.00%) points

Recommend two measures that the HR departments of colleges and universities should take to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Provide a rationale for your response.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 21.6 (13.50%) points

Competent 24.48 (15.30%) points

Exemplary 28.8 (18.00%) points

Four references.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 6 (3.75%) points

Competent 6.8 (4.25%) points

Exemplary 8 (5.00%) points

Writing mechanics, grammar, and formatting.–

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0.00%) points

Needs Improvement 6 (3.75%) points

Competent 6.8 (4.25%) points

Exemplary 8 (5.00%) points