Complete At 2-3 Page Critique Of The Article Below Adhering To The Critique Guide And Using APA Style. ARTICLE CRITIQUE ASSIGNMENT GUIDE & RUBRIC (800 POI

Complete At 2-3 Page Critique Of The Article Below Adhering To The Critique Guide And Using APA Style. ARTICLE CRITIQUE ASSIGNMENT GUIDE & RUBRIC (800 POI

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

ARTICLE CRITIQUE ASSIGNMENT GUIDE & RUBRIC (800 POINTS)

What is an article critique?

An article critique requires you to critically read a piece of research and identify and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

What steps need to be taken to write an article critique?

· Choose an article that meets the criteria outlined by your instructor.

· Read the article to get an understanding of the main idea.

· Jot down notes in the margins of the article as you read for understanding.

How is a critique different from a summary?

A summary of a research article requires you to share the key points of the article so your reader can get a clear picture of what the article is about. A critique may include a brief summary, but the main focus should be on your evaluation and analysis of the research itself.

What should the article critique include?

I. Introduction

Include introductory paragraph(s) that includes the following:

A. The author’s name(s) and the title of the article

B. The author’s main point

· What does the author say is his main point? Significance?

· What does the author say about the purpose of the article?

C. A thesis statement that previews your analysis.

II. Summary

After your introduction, discuss the following in your own words:

A. The arguments or information presented in the article

B. Conceptual/Theoretical Framework

· Discuss what the framework present in the article and how it supports the significance of the article.

· If there is more than one framework presented,

C. Reference to review of literature

· Discuss how the review of literature supports the main point.

· You can point out the most prevalent studies, concepts, etc. of the review.

D. The sample, methodology, instrument, findings, etc. of the article

E. The author’s discussion

· Was it clear, relevant? Explain why or why not.

III.
Critique

After summarizing the article, critique the article by doing the following:

A. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article that you noted while critically reading the article.

B. State your informed opinions about the clarity, relevancy, and accuracy of the article, using specific examples from the article to support your statements.

· To what extent is the title of the article appropriate and clear?

· To what extent is the abstract specific, representative of the study?

· To what extent is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?

· Did the author/s ground their research in theory and previous literature? How effective was this review of literature?

· Are the chosen research methods appropriate to answer the research question(s)?

· Are there issues related to the generalizability of the results? (If you do not feel there was no generalization of results, provide evidence and state it. Likewise, if you do feel that there is generalization, explain.)

· Discuss any errors of the fact and interpretation. (If you do not feel there were errors, provide evidence and state it. Likewise, if you do feel that way, discuss it and provide evidence.)

· Is there evidence of bias or a conflict of interest? (If you do not feel there was bias or conflict of interest, provide evidence and state it. Likewise, if you do feel that way, discuss it and provide evidence.)

· Is the article timely and relevant or is it outdated? (If you do not feel there was relevance, provide evidence and state it. Likewise, if you do feel that way, discuss it and provide evidence.)

IV. Conclusion

Finally, end your article critique with a conclusion that does the following:

A. Summarize the key points in the article, as well the key points from your own analysis.

B. Talk about the areas where the authors could have provided more information, if applicable.

· Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted? Why or why not?

C. Close with a comment about the significance of the research on implications or recommendation for future research needed in the field.

RUBRIC FOR ARTICLE CRITIQUE

ITEMS/DESCRIPTIONS

MAX PTS

PTS EARNED

INTRODUCTION 15

· The introduction has the author’s name(s) and the title of the article

3

· The main point(s) is clearly conveyed in a manner that the ready can grasp without wondering.

6

· The author’s purpose is stated concisely.

3

· The student included a thesis statement that provides a road map of the critique.

3

SUMMARY 25

· The summary reiterates the main points with consideration of the argument and general information in the article.

5

· There is a scholarly discussion of the conceptual/theoretical framework(s) and how it supports the significance of the article.

5

· There is a precise discussion of the review of literature present and how it supports the main point.

5

· The participants (sampling) is presented clearly.

2

· The instrument/method for collecting data is clearly stated.

2

· The methodology is clearly conveyed.

· The findings/data analyses are clearly articulated and includes adequate information about the findings and how well they answered the research questions.

4

· The author’s discussion was precise and clearly showed the author’s perspective of the findings.

2

CRITIQUE 30

· There was a scholarly discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the article from the reader’s perspective. This includes your perspective of the review of literature and conceptual framework.

7

· The discussion of the title of the article included relevance to the overall study.

3

· The discussion of the appropriateness of the abstract included relevance to the overall study.

4

· There was a scholarly discussion of the extent of how well the author articulated the purpose.


3

· There was an appropriate, relevant discussion of how well the research methods adequately answered the research questions.


4

· There is a scholarly discussion of the extent that the author generalized the results—bias vs. unbias and/or conflict of interest.

3

· Discussion of fact vs. interpretation.

3

· There was a scholarly discussion of the relevance of the information presented.

3

CONCLUSION 15

· The conclusion summarized the key points as it related to your own analysis/critiques.

2

· There was a scholarly, relevance discussion of section(s) or information that could have been condensed, omitted, or expanded.

4

· The conclusion adequately provided significance and recommendations for future study on this topic.

4

STYLE 5

Organization

The paper is well organized, thus presenting the paper in manner that clearly conveys components of the Introduction, Summary, Critique, and Conclusion.

3

Mechanics

The paper reflects standard English that is written in a scholarly manner

2

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality