Student Advocacy And “Sweatshop” Labor: The Case Of Russell Athletic Diagnosis and analysis of causes: If labor outsourcing to developing countries is a le

Student Advocacy And “Sweatshop” Labor: The Case Of Russell Athletic Diagnosis and analysis of causes: If labor outsourcing to developing countries is a le

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

  1. Diagnosis and analysis of causes: If labor outsourcing to developing countries is a legitimate business strategy, how can it be handled without risk of running into a sweatshop scandal?
  2. Development of alternatives: What are other countries doing to avoid, reduce or eliminate sweatshops?
    Selection of desired alternative: Decide on alternatives for outsourcing for companies in developed countries, including whether or not to maintain or implement the same high labor standards and regulations as in the home countries.
  3. Implementation of alternatives: Which alternatives would be best for outsourcing for companies in the United States?
  4. Evaluation and feedback: Have your recommendations been implemented in other countries? Are they working? What has been the outcome? 

MGT672

Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation

Below Expectation

Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points

16-20 Points

11-15 Points

6-10 Points

Requirements

Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation – Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation – Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence – Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points

16-20 Points

11-15 Points

6-10 Points

Content

Exceeds Expectation – Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

25-30 Points

19-24 Points

13-18 Points

7-12 Points

Analysis

Exceeds Expectation – Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications.

Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications.

Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications.

Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the Six Steps of Decision Making Framework, concepts and applications.

13-15 Points

10-12 Points

7-9 Points

4-6 Points

Sources

Exceeds Expectation – Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.


Mechanics and Writing

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Exceeds Expectation – Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Meets Expectation – Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.

Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Below Expectation – Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment.

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Limited Evidence – Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.

Total points possible = 100

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality